Brand new budget phone vs older flagship phone?
Moto G Play: https://geni.us/ROuPcTc
MKBHD Merch: http://shop.MKBHD.com
Tech I'm using right now: https://www.amazon.com/shop/MKBHD
Playlist of MKBHD Intro music: https://goo.gl/B3AWV5
Phone provided by Motorola for review.

http://twitter.com/MKBHD
http://instagram.com/MKBHD
http://facebook.com/MKBHD

- This Brand new smartphone from 2023 has a 6 1/2-inch, 90 Hertz display with a hole-punch cutout,, a 5,000 milliamp-hour battery,, triple cameras,, a micro SD card slot for expandable storage,, a headphone jack,, and water resistance for 169. Nice, But what's the catch? There's gotta be a catch, right? So Look, I've said it before and I'll say it again. Good Phones are getting cheap, nuh, and cheap phones are getting good. And This video is gonna focus on the second part of that, which is the cheap phones that are getting so good, because this phone hit my inbox recently.

It's called the Moto G Play for 2023 and if you've been paying attention to what Motorola's been doing recently,, they've been making a lot of really good budget phones in the background for the past couple years. I Just wanted to know, personally, from using it myself, how do you end up at a phone that's a 10th of the price of the ones that I've been really enjoying? So On the outside, well,, it's a pretty big phone, which I like, and there's actually a 6.5 inch flat 90 Hertz LCD display. Now It's not the best-looking screen you've ever seen. It's only 720P, so I can literally see pixels sometimes, and it doesn't get very bright, you know, viewing angles are pretty bad if you get off axis.

And Of course, the bezels you can see are slightly thicker, especially in the chin. And There's this little bit of light fall off around the hole-punch camera at the top. But The thing is,, can you really pixel peep at this price? Like This is plenty of screen for texting, web browsing, navigation, flipping through apps, scrolling through social media, the classic stuff you wanna do on a phone. Mission Accomplished,.

You know,, it's a big screen, so that's not the catch. But What about the build? You've probably picked up that. It's a pretty big phone, but it's also made of plastic. But Honestly,, the layout is perfectly fine.

Like You've got the port and the speakers at the bottom,, there's a headphone jack at the top,, and you have bonus expandable storage alongside the SIM card tray right where it belongs. And On the back, yes,, that is a decently-fast fingerprint reader right in that classic Motorola dimple spot. So It's laid out well,, it absolutely does not bend or creep or anything weird like that.. Plus You might have heard plastic is absolutely not the end of the world when it comes to a smartphone build..

Obviously The premium ones will really like to feel more premium and heavy, and so glass will do that. But This is often more durable than glass if you drop it. And Some people like a lighter-weight phone when it is this big. Also, it is still water resistant.

I Can't say waterproof, it's IP52, but it's water resistant. So The build, that's not the catch. So, okay, what about the battery, you might be wondering, Cheap Phone, it's excellent, perfectly unironically not exaggerating,. it's excellent, which actually shouldn't be a surprise given the spec..
It's a 5,000 milliamp-hour battery powering a phone with a 720p display. So You're good for a day and a half. Easy, two light days is no problem with seven hours of screen on time.. Now It's only up to 10 watt charging, which is pretty slow and there is no wireless charging, but I'm not gonna consider that a gotcha at this price.

Again, it's like you can just charge it up overnight every night like a normal person and battery life will be fine. And Even the software is really good. It's virtually the same experience as their $1000 flagship Edge phone, which is to say,, near stock. Android with a little Moto extra features sprinkled on top.

So At its most basic, it'll kind of feel like a Pixel when you dig through like quick settings and notifications and the launcher, but then you get some Motorola widgets tucked in,. you know,, you get a couple extra settings in the settings app, but then you get this Moto app that lets you dig into your extra gestures and features that they've perfected over the years.. The Double Chop for the flashlight, the three finger screenshot, you know,, the peek display feature that gives you a peek at your new notifications and even swiping down on your notification panel from the fingerprint reader on the back. Basically, everything minus the double twist to quickly open the camera, probably because the camera is not one of those things that you really look forward to on these super cheap phones.

Oh Wow,, look at the light fall off, you can see it on camera, But either way, I'm happy to report that this camera is functional, which is like, that's what you would hope for at this price, which is, yeah,, it's functional. I'm just not a huge fan of the triple camera layout here. Like I Know they're trying to look premium and triple cameras looks premium, but the top one is a two-megapixel macro camera and the bottom one is a two-megapixel depth camera for portrait mode. So I'm mainly just looking for this main 16-megapixel camera to be able to capture scenes, documents,, you know,, take photos and videos without problems..

And It does,, especially if you give it enough light. It's not gonna win any comparison tests, that's for sure. But Hey,, we ask a lot of our phones, like the fact that this $169 gadget can already make phone calls and send text messages and navigate you around the world. and also play games and also browse the web.

And it can also take decent pictures and 1080p videos and that's solid. I Initially had my suspicions about whether or not it was going to actually use this depth camera when I take a portrait-mode photo, but it did yell at me when I covered it and tried to take a portrait-mode shot, so it's paying attention to it, at least. But when I took the photo and turned up the background blur, this is the cutout shape, which, if you zoom in just a little bit, is truly bizarre. It's really bad.
I've never seen anything this bad in my life. They Really Just said, "Yeah, we'll just save a little processing power here and use the zigzag cutout method from those scissors from preschool to make this work." But See,, that's the thing. That is the catch. It's not the build quality, that's fine, and it's definitely not the battery life, that's great.

It's not the cameras and it's certainly not the software. It's that. This phone is slow, really slow. So This phone has a MediaTek Helio G37 chip inside and three gigabytes of RAM.

Other Phones with this chip set include the Techno Spark 9, the Infinix Hot 12, and the HONOR X7a, all of which retail well under $150 US. So Clearly it's a cheap chip, right, and that's how it ended up in this phone. For Some context,, the Geekbench score of the iPhone 14 is this, and the Geekbench score of the Moto G Play is this. So When I say it's trying to save processing power by not really doing detailed portrait cutouts,, I actually mean that, like it absolutely lacks any meaningful processing power.

And I'm not nitpicking about like maybe it's just slow on some high-end games or something. No, this phone is slow all the time. It's slow to scroll and just like, move around the UI. Now Remember I mentioned at the beginning that this phone has a variable 90 Hertz display, but I'll be honest,, it would've taken me a while to tell because it is almost never anywhere near 60 Hertz..

It's constantly hanging up and stuttering everywhere. It's slow to unlock, it's slow to open apps, not not just huge apps, just normal apps. Even The settings apps takes an embarrassingly long time to open and even longer to search through things. Some of this is like speed of storage as well, to be fair.

So I Don't wanna put it all on the chip,, but like the point here is, it's absolutely the catch. This phone is slower than average to take pictures. It's slow to type stuff, to browse around,, and just to do anything like high-end gaming or photo editing is kind of out of the question. It might be the slowest phone I've ever used and I'm constantly reminded of it, which can make it quite unpleasant to use.

So the longer I use this phone, the more it had me thinking about. One big question, which is, is it better to get a brand new, cheap phone like this or an older, formerly expensive flagship one. Like This phone, this is 169 brand new, right? This Phone Here, this is the OnePlus 7 Pro, you might remember it. It's one of my favorite phones ever.

This was the phone of the year in 2019. So This was 669 back when it came out,, but it can be had easily for well under $200 right now secondhand.. So This is just one example of a phone like this. This phone, if you compare dollar for dollar with the Moto, is just so much better of an experience across the board,.

obviously it'll have a much better chip set. So The Snapdragon 855 is a few years old, but it's much more capable and part of an overall smoother, better performance profile with faster storage and more. RAM. It has a much, much nicer OLED screen, which is sharper, brighter,, and actually hits the 90 hertz refresh rate all the time..
It has way more built-in storage, although it's not expandable, and it has a much better set of cameras. It's a primary plus an ultra wide and a zoom, and it's built from glass instead of plastic, which feels rock solid,. And it has a 4,000 milliamp hour battery, which is probably the only hardware line. You can call it a draw or maybe even a win for the Moto phone,.

but we can't forget that warp charging that OnePlus was famous for. So This old flagship will do 30 watts of wired charging. So It's seeming pretty unanimous here. But One distinct advantage of the Budget Phone is because it's new,, it will get software updates further into the future than the old phone.

Now This is, theoretically,, of course,, like Motorola does not have the best track record here,, so it depends on what phone we're talking about, But the Samsung A14 5G, for example,, has a pretty similar spec sheet and a similar price point, and that'll probably get more software updates than the Moto. But The idea here is even if a flagship phone is promised three to four years of software updates, and the Budget Phone is only getting two,, as soon as that flagship phone is more than about three years old,, it doesn't have that advantage anymore. So The OnePlus 7 Pro is probably about done with software updates, while we probably have a few in the tank for the Moto. It is also funny though, sometimes, how I hear people talk about software updates, Like some people don't think about software updates at all,.

they avoid software updates. Don't do that, by the way; the security patches are actually pretty important. But Yeah,, it's just one of those points that has to, by default, go to the newer phone. But The final straw in favor of the older phone is actually the environment..

Just Because buying an older phone that's built to last and getting an extra 2, 3, 4 years out of it potentially is better for the environment overall.. You Buy less new things, it's less e-waste. So That's something that's a feather in the cap of the old phone over the new one. So My general thought as I've looked at this landscape and all these options with old flagships versus new budget phones is the lower the price of the phone, the more I would actually want to buy the older phone.

So at 169, for example,, based on the experience I've had with this phone,, I would definitely rather have, actually, the older flagship phone. There's a lot of flagships you can get at about 200 bucks, you could get this one, you could get a Pixel 5. Secondhand phones are really good. Now If you go up to like 400 bucks, then it's a little more debatable.
There's still some things that would still point me towards the formerly flagship phone, but then you get to like 600 bucks and it's like, oh,, there's really good brand new $600 phones that I would take today and still have the advantages of the software updates. It's not a lot that's better than the Pixel 7, right now. So That's the theory. So There you have it.

At This price point, I'd prefer Prehistoric Premium over presently. Pleasantly priced. Thanks for watching. Talk To you guys in the next one, peace.

Pleasantly Presently, that's a lot. Pleasantly, presently, pleasantly priced?.

By MKBHD

13 thoughts on “This phone is $169 – what’s the catch?”
  1. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Epifanio Santillan says:

    Bro I was checking out what he was selling and I saw one of the photos was a dog and I thought he was trying to sell it but turns out he was selling dog collars.

  2. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Tasfiya Murgi says:

    Man just bought moto and rosted it like hell💀

  3. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Alex Spa says:

    looks like I'm gonna throw it out of the window if it works like that, for that money you better get an used Google Pixel 4a or even a 5, definitely buy used

  4. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Ms666slayer says:

    In Mexico Motorla is making a big comeback people want a cheap smarphone and they offer it.

  5. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Sharpsteel says:

    I've picked up a Galaxy S9+ for 100€ and I think it's 100 times better

  6. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Petra Tóth says:

    I use a note 20 ultra as my main phone and bought a cheap Samsung A32 as a work phone. The thing was super slow, got rid of Samsung's laucher and now it's perfectly useable.

  7. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars leoninc says:

    I’ve given up on Moto phones because of their track record of updating. Not reliable at all! Their best phone before Lenovo took over was the Moto X Pure. It was a phone that had a promising future before the change. I actually still have it! Every once in a while, I play with it. The sound from it’s front firing, stereo speakers, till this day, still sound the best of all the phones I owned. The thing that it lacked was a fingerprint reader and a better processor. It was their flagship phone before the changeover. Nice review, but definitely not for me.

  8. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Alex Ptc says:

    Dude are you serious? Ofcourse its cheap! It has a 3gb ram, it has crap cpu, crap gpu, screen is big and useless(270 ppi), cameras are bad front and back, no NFC, no wireless charging and wired charging of only 10w🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️. Its the damn correct price for it. If you don’t have any ideas for new videos, than don’t make them only to hear yourself talk. Don’t get me wrong, its not a bad phone, its a budget phone with very cheap components.

  9. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Kaan Yilmaz says:

    redmi note 11 goes for the same price and it has sd680

  10. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars MKMR says:

    Lost me at 3GB ram. Better off buying a flagship Samsung or iPhone from a couple of years ago

  11. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Ver Suba says:

    review of an Android phone from an Apple fan boy!

  12. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars A weeb on internet says:

    Well in India we have better options in the same price range

  13. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Nena K. Plans says:

    Probably not compatible with any US carriers

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.