Apple's Studio Display is quite an oddball in 2022...
That shirt! http://shop.MKBHD.com
Tech I'm using right now: https://www.amazon.com/shop/MKBHD
Intro Track: Jordyn Edmonds http://smarturl.it/jordynedmonds
Playlist of MKBHD Intro music: https://goo.gl/B3AWV5
Monitor provided by Apple for review.
http://twitter.com/MKBHD
http://instagram.com/MKBHD
http://facebook.com/MKBHD
That shirt! http://shop.MKBHD.com
Tech I'm using right now: https://www.amazon.com/shop/MKBHD
Intro Track: Jordyn Edmonds http://smarturl.it/jordynedmonds
Playlist of MKBHD Intro music: https://goo.gl/B3AWV5
Monitor provided by Apple for review.
http://twitter.com/MKBHD
http://instagram.com/MKBHD
http://facebook.com/MKBHD
All right so for the past three years, the cheapest, and only display that apple's made has been the five thousand dollar pro display, xdr, which would cost an extra thousand dollars on top just for the matte finish and another thousand dollars just for the stand. So when this new studio display got announced, you know it's a very apple design. It's a 27 inch, 5k screen, surrounded by all these little apple bells and whistles and with the stand included for 1600 bucks, a lot of apple fans were understandably very happy. But then, after the dust of the announcement settled, a lot of us found ourselves asking wait.
A second is this: actually a good deal so now i've been using this display for about two weeks now, and i have an answer for you, but i need you to understand how i'm getting there so for most people who are not interested and we're never gon Na buy this screen anyway, the is it worth it. Conversation basically comes down to the spec sheet, and just comparing it with other similar displays. It's like when you go to buy a house and the appraisal just goes and looks at square footage and the number of bedrooms and bathrooms and materials used in proximity. It comes up with a price based on what other houses with the same sort of specs are going for.
So this new studio display is 27 inches. Diagonally 5k resolution 600 nits brightness. It's a ips lcd at 60 hertz with p3 color. It's got a webcam up top.
It's got some speakers at the bottom, some usb-c ports around the back and it's 1 600. So if i was an appraiser looking for a comparable house, i would be looking at the lg ultrafine 5k. That is also a 27 inch. 5K ips lcd, it's at 500 nits, also at 60, hertz with p3 color, a webcam some speakers and some usb usb-c ports on the back - that's 1, 300.
But it's also 5 years old. And while there are not that many other 5k displays out there, there are a ton of 4k screens and one of those would be the dell ultra sharp u2720q. That is also a 27-inch ips lcd panel, with thinner bezels, also at 60 hertz, and also with p3 color and some ports around the back super well reviewed 589. So if you just go by the specs of the panel, it's actually pretty clear that this display and the tech you're getting for the price is a bad deal, but the second you're actually considering buying a display.
You realize it's not just the display specs of the panel that make or break the experience. It's all the stuff that surrounds the screen for someone actually considering using it and apple products. They just have a habit of doing this thing where they don't have the best specs on paper, but they offer a unique combination of things that make it really hard to do any sort of one-to-one comparison, because nobody else has that exact, unique combination of things like You know how they make up the most cherry-picked stats in nba media, like oh. This guy just became the third player ever to get a triple-double before his 26th birthday after eating apple jacks for breakfast that morning or like wow, there's only five players to play 800 games and join the 13.5 5.9 1.4 49 30 club. Anyway. That's how it feels talking about this monitor so, first of all, it's 5k not 4k and, like i said, there's tons of 4k monitors out there, but this one is 5k for a reason. It's basically the same panel from the 27-inch imac, which many people, including myself, really liked, even though it's quite old, so it's sitting at a solid 218 pixels per inch and it also benefits from being exactly twice the vertical and horizontal resolution of 2560 by 1440.. So scaling is super clean and everything looks sharper as a result and then, as far as single backlight lcds go it's pretty solid.
It's got bumped up to 600 nits, which is plenty fine indoors as long as you're not near any windows. I have not had any issues worse than normal with ghosting or light bleed, as you see, with some lcds, but obviously it's nowhere near something like a mini led display with separate backlight zones that can do really good hdr. And then this one i've been testing is the nano texture version, which is a 300 upgrade. It's extremely good at killing reflections and it's impressive that it's this good for 300 bucks when the same treatment on the pro display was a thousand bucks.
But honestly, i still probably wouldn't recommend it unless you literally work with a window like right behind you or something, because the version without nano texture is always going to be slightly sharper and punchier and much easier to clean. But speaking of upgrades, this monitor, which has the stand permanently attached. So you know it's included, which is nice but uh. It has height adjustment, which is cool right, it's nice, but the the base version doesn't have that, and so this, just just the ability to adjust height, is a 400 upgrade to this stand.
So the version without adjustment is a little bit low and i think a lot of people started to notice that - and you know the imax didn't have height adjustment, but just for a monitor this expensive to have to spend 400 extra dollars to be able to do This seems kind of ridiculous, even though you can go to an apple store if you do get buyer's remorse and have them add it after the fact. But hey, if you do it's a really solid stand, all metal perfectly balanced and spring-loaded to hold the panel firmly in place. It's actually more sturdy in my experience than the pro display xdrs, mostly because it doesn't have to rotate and just the overall build quality of this monitor is top of the line it is built so well and of course, this will never show up on the spec Sheet - and this isn't even something traditionally that matters all that much with a monitor something you don't touch, you know a phone, you want to be built, well things you hold and carry, but this is just going to sit on your desk, but they went over the Top with the build quality, the overall design, aesthetic, so in a world of basically, all plastic monitors, this one's full metal jacket, sharp corners, the precision drilled perforations at the top for ventilation. All of it, kinda is in a class of its own, and i love it. They left enough room inside for a power supply to be built in so there's no power, brick or wall wart. This is probably the best looking and best built monitor out right now. Now, of course, yes, you'd have to really care about something like that to spend extra on it. If it's just gon na sit on your desk, but there also is a catch and it's a really weird weird decision, but the power cable is not removable.
I mean when you look back here: it's a black plastic circle that looks like it should be removable and it turns out. If you pull really hard, you can actually rip it out the back, but it's pretty clear: it's not designed to be removed by the user. This is from the same company that designed a new magsafe connector for the new imac. This is a super.
Baffling choice turns out there's a special tool required to remove the studio display properly. I don't count that as user removable we've all seen what a normal removable monitor cable looks like, but now instead it's kind of in this homepod situation where, like it's clearly not meant to be user removed, and so now, if the cable does get damaged at all. If you run a wheel over it or pet shoes on it or something, you have to send the whole thing back to get repaired thumbs down now above this panel is a 12 megapixel ultra wide camera with center stage and triple microphones, all powered by a literal A13 bionic chip for those who, remember correctly, that's the same chip that powered the entire iphone 11.. Now, while this is basically the same webcam hardware as the new ipad air, it looks substantially worse, like it's just flat and grainy all the time in any lighting i throw at it.
Maybe i just got my hopes up too high. I mean i knew it would be softer because it's cropping into a 12 megapixel ultra wide frame, so there's less pixels. I knew wouldn't have shallow depth of field or anything. It's not a big sensor, but i mean the mics sound, pretty good, as you can hear, but there's just no shadows.
It refuses to let anything dark actually, look dark, which for me is not great apple, is actually promising a software update that may help things. Imagine that a software update for a monitor, apparently it has 64 gigs of on-board storage for some reason. But yeah bottom line is it's. It's convenient that there's a webcam built in, but there's definitely still a market for, like an opel, c1 type webcam the stuff that looks way better than this.
But then there are the speakers so they're all situated in the bottom of the monitor. Here there are six total four force: canceling woofers and two tweeters. They say it's the best computer speakers they've ever shipped in any of their systems, and it's true. It's 100 true. This thing i've compared it to the 16-inch macbook pro. These are substantially louder. They fill a room if you wanted to, they can create a somewhat convincing dolby atmos surround setup. If you want it's, it's really good so for built-ins they are above and beyond the rest.
They don't sound as good as dedicated speakers, but if you really want good built-in speakers, then yeah, if you're into that these do it by the way apple should just make speakers right. I mean the homepod doesn't count they should right. They should just make speakers so anyway, if you want a monitor for the panel quality and the panel quality alone, then there are lots of others just like this for way less money. But if you're, one of the surprisingly large group of people who are waiting for a monitor that would work really well in this apple ecosystem world of products, then this is just what you've been waiting for.
It's pretty much made to be used with the new mac studio, hence the name i also plugged into the macbook pro which charges the laptop at 96 watts but hilariously. I really just didn't think it was that great of a pair i mean it looks great next to it, but the macbook pro has a much brighter higher refresh rate mini led display. That just looks way better to me and was preferable for me to use. So i just ended up wanting to use the promotion of the laptop screen all the time, but then you know just for fun.
You can plug it into an ipad and it works perfectly normally mirrors and charges the ipad and we also plugged it into a pc. And it worked like a normal monitor at full 5k resolution, and it does actually use the speakers and the webcam. But without any of the processing or center stage that comes from lighting up that a13, what an odd combination of parts for real honestly for nearly two thousand dollars, if you just close your eyes and say: okay, it's 20, 22 and apple is going to make a Studio display, you'd, expect mini, led, maybe or maybe promotion or maybe it might have face id or a good webcam or just any combination of those things. Instead, it has none and a non-removable power, cable and a non-user upgradable stand todd that is a rare swing and a miss for me, someone who works in a studio but the real question.
The real question is: is the studio display a good deal or not? Well, is the rolls royce ghost a good deal, because it's the only four-door sedan, with suicide doors and a 6.7 liter v12 for under 400 000? Does that make it a good deal or how about are the nike hyper adapts a good deal because they are the cheapest best self-lacing shoes? You can get right now for 350. Does that make them a good deal? I guess what i'm trying to say is: maybe it doesn't really matter if it's a good deal or not? If it's exactly what you want like, if there are other cheaper options, it doesn't really matter, because there's only one that does the exact thing that you want. It to, and so that's what this is for some people - you're, probably just going to want to get this one but yeah. No, it's not a good deal. .
My 27 inch iMac in 2015 was £2500…. you realise Apple got rid of it to overcharge you for this crap….
I'm an Apple user since Macintosh 1984. Still have it. And I have purchased nearly everything Apple has put out there. But lately, buying into Apple products is turning the user into idiotic, gullible and stupid buyers. Pure rip off. This Tim Crook has really abused of their loyal fans, just like Disney is also ruining the parks. I love smart design, but I'm not stupid in overpaying for a piece of metal.
The demographic that apple targets doesn’t even exist now 😂 they gotta make products to order at this point 😂 I’m still using my IPhone 11 and IPad not really pressed to spend another 1K on a apple product at all; if I did it would be airpods cause I lose them every time 😑
Can somebody for the love of God explain to me why this display is not using the a13 as an apple TV or a huge I pad for example? They literally put a solid chip with 64gb of storage only for web cam image processing and it does it badly. What the actual f?!
The display is a joke to any 27” 5K iMac owner. Same display with the price jacked up forcing us intel Mac users to either buy a Studio or downgrade to a 24” iMac
Apple are just taking us all for fools. £1500 for a monitor that should be available for £1000. A non-removable power cord and non-removable stand. They are surely taking the p*ss.
It’s so strange why apple does this. They create a display that’s not comparable to others because probably no other display has such good speakers and mics. Also nearly no 5k 27“ displays exist. And then apple just sells a display that is not height adjustable and can’t rotate which are features that you even get in some of the cheapest displays out there. I can even think of company polices forbidding to buy such a display for ergonomic reasons. Except if you pay $400 extra 🤡
This is my favorite ending to an mkbhd episode of all the episodes I’ve seen. Keep callin it like it is Marques
I don't own any apple products and this is baffling. But I also cannot afford to spend 1.5k on a monitor, so maybe my opinion doesn't matter.
"I want to explain how I got there…" I searched my soul for every possible way I could rationalise buying a $1600 monitor that's actually a 5 year LG monitor.. and I decided to go with "ecosystem" because while it makes literally NO sense – Apple fans will nod their heads and go "yes… ecosystem…"
you can get yourself the new Alienware 34 inch 3440x1440p 175Hz QD-OLED ultra wide for 1299. It will have better color accuracy than this screen, better for both HDR content consumption and creation, is actually a high refresh rate, and all the other benefits of oled but with even more quantum dot goodness. I know its ultra wide and not a extremely high resolution like 5k or even 4k, but it would be a great monitor that could work for both work and play.
Remember this- they were the ones removing power cables for their IPhones to be "sustainable".
Also Apple : proceeds to build in non-removable power cords sigh
totally sustainable right
Marques: "It refuses to let anything dark look dark, which for me is not great.."
Apple forced whitefacing hahaha